State v. Cooper
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
We deem it advisable to make certain observations at the outset. The plea of nolo contendere entered by the defendant and accepted by the solicitor with the approval of the presiding judge was absolute in character. This being true, there is no basis for the contention of the defendant that his plea of nolo contendere was a conditional one with the ultimate issue of his guilt or innocence to be determined by the presiding judge. It necessarily follows that the decisions condemning conditional pleas of nolo, contendere are not germane to the case in hand. S. v. Horne, 234 N.C. 115, 66 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The People v. McWilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. StansburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- People v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.