Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Webster
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1990No. 56959-2PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*637Smith, J.
The City of Seattle sought review of a King County Superior Court decision affirming the Seattle Municipal Court which dismissed charges against Respondent Arlander Duke Webster for violation of the Seattle Pedestrian Interference Ordinance, Seattle Municipal Code 12A.12.015(B)(1). Both courts concluded that the section of the ordinance under which respondent was charged was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We disagree and remand the case to the Seattle Municipal Court for trial.
The principal question we consider in this case is whether subsection (B)(1) of Seattle Municipal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.