Legal Opinion
McCullagh v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1922No. S. F. No. 10117PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J. pro tem.
This is a petition for a writ of review wherein A. McCullagh and some seventy-seven other persons are applicants for the writ, to be directed against the Railroad Commission of California and Cone-land Water Company, a corporation, the respondents herein, and by which it is sought to have a certain order and decision of the Railroad Commission declaring the said Cone-land Water Company to have been and to be a public utility and directing a certain increase in water rates affecting injuriously the rights of the applicants herein, reviewed and annulled.
As to the main facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Stratton v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Traber v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Butte Co. W. U. Assn. v. Railroad Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Forsyth v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Central Trust Co. v. Calumet Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Coneland Water Co. v. NickallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Market St. Ry. Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.