Legal Opinion

Holmes v. McColgan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1941No. L. A. 17306PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This action was brought to recover money alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected as personal income taxes for the calendar year 1935. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The following facts are set forth in the complaint: In 1933 and 1934 plaintiff and certain of his children became the owners by discovery, location and purchase of an interest in mining property situated in Kern County, California, known as the Silver Queen, and a mining lease of a portion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. SmietankaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Garrison v. RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Erlich v. Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API