Legal Opinion

Bank of Vance v. Crowder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe action is prosecuted by tbe plaintiff for tbe purpose of impressing a trust, for its benefit as receiver, upon tbe town lot described in tbe deed from Gholson to Mrs. Crowder. Tbe equitable doctrine upon which tbe relief is sought is not questioned. If E. B. Crowder held tbe proceeds of tbe discounted note as a trustee for tbe Farmers and Merchants Bank a trust resulted by operation of law for tbe benefit of tbe bank and under tbe doctrine of implied trusts tbe fund could be followed into any property into which it was converted or invested unless affected by tbe rights of a bona fide…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Edwards v. . CulbersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Singleton v. . CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Jarrett v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API