Metropolitan Waste Control Commission v. City of Minnetonka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
We reverse an order of the district court affirming and refusing to vacate an arbitration award in which the arbitrators exceeded their powers under the restricted terms of the submission.
Plaintiff, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (hereafter “commission”), is organized under Minn. St. c. 473C for the purpose of collecting, treating, and disposing of sewage in the seven counties over which it has jurisdiction. Section 473C.08, subds. 3 and 4, requires that costs of debt service attributable to reserved capacity of treatment works and interceptors be allocated among…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Zelle v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- City of Brooklyn Center v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.