In re Harris-Smith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Respondent consented to an indefinite suspension imposed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland on July 14, 1999, and to continue until lifted by further order of that court. The order stated that the suspension resulted from “a course of continuing conduct by Respondent of misfeasance and nonfeasance observed by Judges of this court,” which “appeared to put her clients’ affairs in jeopardy.”1 On August 25,1999, we entered an order pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d) temporarily suspending respondent in the District of Columbia and asked the Board on Professional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Harris-SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- In Re BladesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Harris-SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005