Legal Opinion

Codd v. McGoldrick Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1929No. 5154PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

— This cause was formerly before this court on the question of the sufficiency of the petition (mandate) which was there sustained. (Codd v. McGoldrick, 46 Ida. 256, 267 Pac. 439), and is now before us for determination upon the merits, evidence responsive to the issues having been introduced before a district judge to whom the matter was referred for that purpose, the question being whether the evidence shows that the defendant should be held to be a common carrier of logs and compelled to operate as such.

The evidence shows without conflict that, for the purpose of securing the right of way…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Canyon View Irrigation Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bassett v. SwensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bowen v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McKenney v. AnselmoIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. AitchisonMontana Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API