Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Department of Social Security

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1942No. 28649PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 127 P.2d 682. Prior to June 7, 1941, respondent was awarded a senior citizen grant of $34 a month under initiative 141 (chapter 1, Laws of 1941, p. 3). On that date, conceiving he was entitled to $40 a month, respondent made a demand upon the director for "a fair hearing" under the provisions of § 8, p. 7 (Rem. Supp. 1941 § 9998-41), of the act, which, among other things, provides:

"It shall be the duty of the department upon receipt of suchnotice to set a date for the fair hearing, such date to be notmore than thirty days after receipt of notice." (Italics ours.)

More than thirty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Nafus v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Temple v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
  5. State v. KeesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hayes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hansen v. West Coast Wholesale Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Sunny Brook Farms v. OmdahlWashington Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API