State v. Aitchison
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson
Plaintiffs commenced this action to condemn a site for the purpose of creating, constructing, installing, flooding and main taining a rearing pond in which to plant, propagate and raise fish.
The defendant Aitehison is the owner of the land sought to be condemned. The defendant Western is the holder of a mortgage on these premises. After the service of summons and on the return day thereof, the defendants appeared in person without counsel, when a hearing was had and testimony received in support of the complaint. Thereafter the district court made and filed its interlocutory judgment and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Leeds v. City of RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Montana Power Company v. BokmaMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- General Agriculture Corporation v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Bozeman Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. VanimanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- McCabe Petroleum Corp. v. Easement & Right-Of-Way Across Township 12 North, Range 23 EastMontana Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.