Legal Opinion

Carrington v. Crandall

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1944No. 7140PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

The original complaint in this action was to quiet title to the waters of Mahogany Creek in Teton county. By amendment 4A to the complaint, appellant claimed adverse possession, and that respondents had abandoned their decreed rights by failing for- more than five years to apply the waters to a beneficial use.

By the Snake River Decree, dated December 16, 1910, the following water rights, among others, were awarded the parties in this action or their predecessors in interest:

“C. E. Carrington, plaintiff, 160 miner’s inches with priority of May 26, 1900, in Mahogany Creek;

Norma Dustin and Mrs.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lindblom v. Round Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Pleasants v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Webb v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Zezi v. LightfootIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hawley v. Kansas Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. A. J. Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Ersel H. Beus and Anna Beus, W. J. Beus, and Leone Beus v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. Ward v. YoderWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API