Hasse v. Rainsdon (In Re Pringle)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the debtor, Raymond Pringle, filed his chapter 7 1 bankruptcy, he transferred his house to Jolene Hasse. The bankruptcy court found this transaction to be avoidable as a fraudulent transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 548. Hasse appeals. After finding that the bankruptcy court and this Panel have authority to decide the matters involved in this appeal, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTS
A. Prepetition Actions
Hasse and Pringle had a long-term relationship as boyfriend and girlfriend. They lived together in Pringle’s house (the “Residence”) for at least eight years.
In April 2008,…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LTF Real Estate Co. v. Expert South Tulsa, LLC (In re Expert South Tulsa, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Reinbold v. Morton Community Bank (In re Mid-Illini Hardwoods, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
- Haley v. Barclays Bank Delaware (In re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Reinbold v. Kohansieh (In re Sandburg Mall Realty Management LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
- Solution Trust ex rel. AWTR Liquidation Trust v. 2100 Grand LLC (In re AWTR Liquidation Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.