Legal Opinion

Herman v. Arndt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

The appeal is from an order in the Supreme Court setting aside service of a writ of capias ad respondendum.

Plaintiff and defendant, on Eebruary 8th, 1935, as operators of respective automobiles, experienced an automobile collision on the Pulaski Skyway. Both were taken to the Oakland avenue police station in Jersey City, and defendant was put under cash bail to appear for hearing on a charge of reckless driving. On the hearing date defendant, a resident of the State of Michigan temporarily sojourning in New York, came from the city of New York…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Logan v. LawsheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Moore v. Richardson & BaldwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Laura v. PuncerelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  4. Morgan v. BowmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  5. Ferenga v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grober v. KahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Randall v. RandallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Inst. Manage. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Santos v. FigueroaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Younger v. YoungerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API