Legal Opinion

Omnium De Participations Industries De Luxe (S. A.) v. Spoturno

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 3, 1937No. Foreign Attachment, Nos. 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

These cases are before us on the motions of the defendants, the administrators of Joseph Marie Francois Spoturno, sometimes known as Coty, or Spoturno-Coty, to vacate and set aside the plaintiffs’ writs of attachment and the service and returns thereon in the foreign attachment proceedings instituted by them against the defendants’ intestate, during his lifetime.

A foreign attachment is purely a statutory proceeding, Rev. Code 1935, §§ 4630-4635; see, also, Rev. Code 1935, § 2124, but the statute is based on the custom of London merchants in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  3. Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. McLaughlin v. BahreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. Third National Bank v. GartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Timmons v. CropperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  2. Brainard v. CanadaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Timmons v. CropperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API