Omnium De Participations Industries De Luxe (S. A.) v. Spoturno
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
These cases are before us on the motions of the defendants, the administrators of Joseph Marie Francois Spoturno, sometimes known as Coty, or Spoturno-Coty, to vacate and set aside the plaintiffs’ writs of attachment and the service and returns thereon in the foreign attachment proceedings instituted by them against the defendants’ intestate, during his lifetime.
A foreign attachment is purely a statutory proceeding, Rev. Code 1935, §§ 4630-4635; see, also, Rev. Code 1935, § 2124, but the statute is based on the custom of London merchants in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
- McLaughlin v. BahreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
- Third National Bank v. GartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Timmons v. CropperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
- Brainard v. CanadaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Timmons v. CropperCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961