MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The complaint is in three counts. In the first count, the plaintiff seeks to recover against the named defendant and two of the individual defendants, Homer and Bernice Harmon, on a note, and in the third count, against the named defendant and the defendant Homer on a judgment obtained in the Supreme Court of New York. In the second count, the plaintiff seeks to set aside a deed given by the defendant Bernice to the defendant Charles Kaplan. The named defendant, hereinafter called the corporation, counterclaimed, seeking damages for breach of contract. The trial court rendered judgment for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sadd v. HeimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Anderson v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Rosenbluth v. DeForest & Hotchkiss Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Winsor v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Cole v. SteinlaufSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.