Legal Opinion
Sadd v. Heim
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1956PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The defendants George Heim, Jr., and Helen Heim own a parcel of land in Lebanon upon which the plaintiff holds two mortgages. The validity of one of them, concededly a first mortgage, is not questioned in this litigation and we will make little further reference to it. The undisputed facts concerning the other mortgage are these: On September 5, 1952, the Heims, wishing to build a cowshed and needing money to carry out the idea, executed and delivered to the plaintiff their promissory demand note in the amount of $2500 and, to secure its payment, a mortgage upon the land mentioned above. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pettibone v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
- Beach v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Hart v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
- Stoughton v. PascoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Matz v. ArickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Union Trust Co. v. HeggelundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State National Bank v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.