Cole v. Steinlauf
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWynne, C. J.
There is no dispute as to the facts. The case presented a single question of law. It appears from the finding that it was submitted on the pleadings. The only evidence was the deed which was part of the defendant's chain of title. The plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a contract for the sale of real estate situated in Norwalk. The plaintiffs were named as purchasers and the defendant as seller. The contract provided that if the seller was unable to convey title to the premises free and clear of any defect of title, the purchasers had *631the option of rejecting the seller’s deed. In the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chappell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Chamberlain v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
- Frank Towers Corp. v. LavianaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Farrel Foundry v. DartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- New Haven Trust Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Leveille v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.