Legal Opinion

Application of Arthur C. Borg and Stephen J. Zajac

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 18, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7824Published

1Opinion of the Court

392 F.2d 642

Application of Arthur C. BORG and Stephen J. Zajac.

Patent Appeal No. 7824.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 18, 1968.

Arthur G. Gilkes, Chicago, Ill., (Edward B. Beale, Washington, D. C., Arthur H. Bransky, Chicago, Ill., Robert J. Wagner, of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C., (Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, ALMOND and KIRKPATRICK*, Judges.

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

1

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API