Lydman v. De Haas
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Baraga; O’Brien, J. Case by Oscar Lydman against Nathan Mitchell De Haas for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for an injury to the left hand of the plaintiff, received on September 9, 1912. This was a few days after the workmen’s compensation act took effect, and about a month before the defendant went out of business; the said defendant not having elected to pay compensation under the said act.
The defendant, ás lessee, had been running a sawmill at Skanee, Baraga county, for about 20 years. *130The plaintiff had worked for defendant for some time about six years before, and during the summer of 1912 he worked for defendant abaut two months altogether; first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beghold v. Auto Body Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Barfoot v. White Star LineMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Charters v. Industrial WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Pequignot v. GermainMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estep v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
- De Francesco v. Piney Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stevenson v. DourosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Narregang v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.