Legal Opinion

Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1995No. Docket 165882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Michael J. Kelly and Griffin, JJ. Gribbs, P.J.

Previously, this Court held that both common-law damages and defenses not abolished by statute were available in a civil action under § 641(2) of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (wdca), MCL 418.641(2); MSA 17.237(641)(2), when an employee sues an employer for an injury such that, had the employer been insured as required by §§ 171 and 611 of the wdca, MCL 418.171, 418.611; MSA 17.237(171), 17.237(611), suit would be prohibited by the exclusive remedy provision of § 131 of the wdca, MCL 418.131; MSA…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Twork v. Munising Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mayhew v. Berrien County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Stanley v. Hinchliffe & KennerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. David J McQueer v. Perfect Fence CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Worker's Compensation LienMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. McCAUL v. MODERN TILE AND CARPET, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Alma Piston Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API