Legal Opinion

De Francesco v. Piney Mining Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigb County. Action by Antonio De Francesco against the Piney Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenrarger, Judge:

For the loss of a hand and an eye and other injuries caused by the explosion of a stick of momobel, a form of dynamite, the plaintiff employed by the defendant as a coal miner, at the time of his injuries, recovered a judgment for the sum of $5,000.00, against the latter, on the theory of its negligent failure to warn him of the danger of his employment and instruct him as to methods of avoiding it.

Certain defenses formerly available in actions of this kind, assumption of risk, contributory negligence and injury by negligence of a fellow-servant, were abrogated by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norman v. Virginia-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Holland v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Stuart v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Wagner v. H. W. Jayne Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Brands v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lester v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rhodes v. J. B. B. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Louis v. Smith-McCormick Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Powell v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API