Stevenson v. Douros
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
'CAMPBELL, J.
Defendant employed plaintiff as a cook in his cafe and restaurant. Neither defendant nor plaintiff had served *269the notice contemplated by section 9438, R. C. 1919-, to exempt themselves from the operation of the Workmen’s -Compensation Law. Defendant, -however, had failed and neglected to provide the insurance required by the Workmen’s -Compensation Law. Plaintiff, while cooking in the' restaurant, suffered a personal injury, and instituted the present action- against the defendant to recover damages in the sum of $6,611. Defendant demurred ttpon the ground that the complaint did…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Fahler v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Lydman v. De HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Mammott v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Utah Idaho Sugar Co. v. TemmeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Stoner v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Keil v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.