Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Douros

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1931No. File No. 6993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'CAMPBELL, J.

Defendant employed plaintiff as a cook in his cafe and restaurant. Neither defendant nor plaintiff had served *269the notice contemplated by section 9438, R. C. 1919-, to exempt themselves from the operation of the Workmen’s -Compensation Law. Defendant, -however, had failed and neglected to provide the insurance required by the Workmen’s -Compensation Law. Plaintiff, while cooking in the' restaurant, suffered a personal injury, and instituted the present action- against the defendant to recover damages in the sum of $6,611. Defendant demurred ttpon the ground that the complaint did…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Watts v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Fahler v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lydman v. De HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Mammott v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Utah Idaho Sugar Co. v. TemmeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Stoner v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Keil v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API