Legal Opinion

Lusco v. Tavitian

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 10, 1956No. 45132PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of described real property in Kansas City. The trial court found for plaintiff, and entered a judgment and decree directing that defendant execute and deliver to plaintiff a warranty deed, and that plaintiff contemporaneously pay to defendant the amount o.f $20,000 and execute and deliver to defendant a note secured by a deed of trust for the remainder of the purchase price, all in compliance with an option to purchase;executed by defendant and alleged and found.to have been exercised by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Lively v. TaborSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Chapman v. BreezeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Kludt v. ConnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. HGS Homes, Inc. v. Kelly Residential Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Haase v. RichmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Frey v. YustMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. In Re Estate of WeinsaftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API