Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coyle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1959No. Appeal, No. 72PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This appeal involves the weight to be given to evidence of a blood grouping test which showed that the defendant in a bastardy case could not have been the father of the prosecutrix’s child. The jury, apparently ignoring the evidence of the blood test, convicted the defendant, and the court below refused a new trial. After sentence was imposed upon the defendant, he appealed to this Court.

Prior to the Act of June 15, 1951, P. L. 585, 19 PS §871, Pennsylvania courts granted new trials in cases where the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Jordan v. MaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goldman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API