Luders v. Pummer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a summary judgment.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note in favor of Harry Luders, plaintiff’s husband, for $3,000 executed by defendant in May, 1955. In June, the payee, Harry Luders, assigned the note to himself and his wife, plaintiff herein, as joint tenants. In the following November, Harry Luders passed away and plaintiff thereupon became vested with title to said note. She filed suit on the note on April 5, 1956.
Defendant answered, setting up a counterclaim consisting of two items: (1) a promissory note for $1,000 dated July…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- De Echeguren v. De EchegurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Craig v. EarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Norman v. BerneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- RUBEL BAKING COMPANY v. LevittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.