Norman v. Berney
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
— Defendant Ray Bemey appeals from an order denying his motion to set off judgment.
Questions Presented
1. Was the default judgment in Handley v. Norman valid?
2. Did Weingarten acquire an interest under the contingent fee agreement which diminished or defeated defendant Berney’s right to set off the Handley judgment ?
3. Is defendant Berney entitled to set off the Handley judgment or portion thereof against the Norman judgment ?
Record
On August 6, 1962, T. H. Handley commenced action number 53641 in the Superior Court of Monterey County against Ernest E. and Emma Jean Norman. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Salaman v. BoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- In Re Tax Claim Bureau, German Tp., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.