Legal Opinion
Craig v. Earl
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1961No. Civ. 6440PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of certain defendants. The question on appeal is whether the record supports the conclusion of the trial court that the plaintiffs’ ease presents no triable issue of fact. The second amended complaint, upon which issue was joined, is directed against Rainbow Municipal "Water District, and Guy C. Earl, Jr., Harlan B. Griswold, D. L. Caldwell, W. N. Davis and Ross Dailey “as individuals, not as directors of Rainbow Municipal Water District,” and alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners of certain real property ; that the ‘ ‘…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Leasman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Saatzer v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.