Legal Opinion

Clarke E. Davenport v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association and Continental Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1963No. 18780PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action below for lack of jurisdiction. An appeal lies here (28 U.S. C.A. § 1291). The action below relies for jurisdiction upon diversity (28 U.S. C.A. § 1332). Defendant’s answer claims the amount in controversy does not exceed $10,000. Plaintiff urges it does.

Plaintiff set forth an action at law for deceit against the two defendant insurance companies, alleging they had defrauded him out of the benefits under his sickness and accident policies by representing to him that his condition was neither sickness nor accident…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Marion F. McDonald v. C. Y. Patton, Sr., Trading and Doing Business as Patton's Gulf ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Howard L. Chabner v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
  4. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Conrad Associates v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API