Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The question here is whether petitioner’s complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that the matter in controversy did not really and substantially exceed $3,000 as required by §§ 24 and 37 of the Judicial Code.
Filed in the federal court for the Middle District of Alabama, petitioner’s complaint alleged that he had been induced to purchase an insurance certificate through fraudulent misrepresentations of respondents’ agent bear ing upon its actual value, and claimed $200,000 as actual and punitive damages. The record shows that at the time of the dismissal petitioner had paid only…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sparks v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by293 opinions
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- St. Paul Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. Larry GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.