Legal Opinion

In Re the Assessment for the Improvement of Sixth Avenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1930No. 22094. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

From a judgment canceling certain assessments and reducing others, as contained in the Denny hill regrade No. 2 physical improvement assessment roll, the city of Seattle appeals.

Prior to 1906, Denny hill, in the city of Seattle, rose to a considerable elevation from a point just north of Pine street, and extended thence a considerable distance in a general northerly direction. In 1906, by an improvement project known as Denny hill regrade No. 1, the southerly portion of the hill or ridge was removed, and the property brought down to grade. A considerable portion of the elevation, however, was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Spokane v. FonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Seattle v. WaldWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Powell v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Viegle v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re SchmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hargreaves v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re the Confirmation of Local Improvement No. 6097Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Cammack v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of DaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API