Legal Opinion
Hargreaves v. Mukilteo Water District
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1953No. 32361PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The commissioners of the Mukilteo water district have now tried for the fourth time to spread assessments over the properties in local improvement district No. 16 to pay for the improvements which that district was created to provide. Each time, some or all of the assessments have been canceled or reduced by either the superior or the supreme court. The matter is now before this court for the second time.
The location and extent of the local improvement district, the character of the improvements, and something of the problems faced by the commissioners are explained in Hargreaves v. Mukilteo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Eggerth v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Murphy v. SummersettWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of DaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re SchmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Seattle v. Rogers Clothing for Men, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Indian Trail Trunk Sewer Sys.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- In Re the Consolidated Appeals of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.