Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Dayton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1939No. 27435. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts.

In 1923, the council of the city of Dayton passed an ordinance providing for the paving of one of its streets on the special assessment plan. The ordinance created a local improvement district and authorized the issuance of local improvement bonds to the contractor in payment of the cost of the improvement. Notice was given of hearing on the assessment roll, and thereafter the assessment roll, no objections having been filed, was approved and confirmed by the city council. The improvement was completed and local improvement fund bonds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sheley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gerlach v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Horton Investment Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re the Assessment for the Improvement of Sixth AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Loveless v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Collier v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hargreaves v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. City of Longview v. Longview Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Time Oil Co. v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API