Legal Opinion
Cammack v. City of Port Angeles
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 26, 1976No. 1684-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
This appeal involves the extent of the court’s authority to review a local improvement district assessment levied by the City of Port Angeles against plaintiff’s property for street and storm drainage improvements.
The LID was initiated at the request of several residents, including plaintiff, 1 of the Canyonedge Addition adjacent to the southern boundary of Port Angeles. The addition consists of some 38 lots of various sizes and shapes.
Ordinance No. 1828, which established the LID, contained an estimated cost of $119,543.59 and provided:
Such assessments shall be made against the property . .…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Maynard Inv. Co., Inc. v. McCannWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re SchmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Bellevue Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Indian Trail Trunk Sewer Sys.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- In Re Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Time Oil Co. v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.