Legal Opinion
Wasko v. Farley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 2008No. AC 28074PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff Kim M. Wasko 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Daniel T. Farley, Sr., and Daniel T. Farley, Jr. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the court failed to comply with General Statutes § 52-434, thereby depriving the court of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) the court required the plaintiff to attend jury selection in violation of General Statutes § 51-240 (a), Practice Book § 16-6 and the constitution of Connecticut, (3) the judge who denied the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Umsteadt v. G. R. RealtyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Scarfo v. SnowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Bongiorno v. CaponeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Citibank, N.A. v. LindlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Gould v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.