Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 20, 1994No. Court No. 91-08-00568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1013Opinion

Tsoucalas, Judge:

Defendant-intervenor FAG Cuscinetti SpA (“FAG”) moves for an order to direct the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), to issue a fourth redetermination on remand and make the following corrections or amendments to its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, The Torrington Company v. United States Slip Op. 94-37 (March 4, 1994) (“Final Results”): (1) reinstatement of FAG’S U.S. discounts as originally reported or as indirect selling expenses; (2) reinstatement of a circumstance of sale (“COS”) adjustment to foreign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. The Ad Hoc Committee of Az-Nm-Tx-Fl Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. The United States, Cemex S.A., and Apasco, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  5. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  3. Thyssen Stahl AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  5. Rautaruukki Oy v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API