Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 19, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 92-06-00422PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiff, Federal-Mogul Corporation (“Federal-Mogul”), challenges certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final results of redetermination on remand filed pursuant to Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT 785, 862 F. Supp. 384 (1994) concerning Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, et al.; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews (‘Final Results”), 57 Fed. Reg. 28,360 (1992), as amended, Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. And Daewoo Electronics Corp. Of America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Goldstar Co., Ltd. And Goldstar Electronics International, Inc. v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America, Independent Radionic Workers of America and Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996