Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 7, 1993No. Consolidated Court No. 91-07-00530 and 91-08-00569PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiffs, Federal-Mogul Corporation (“Federal-Mogul”) and The Torrington Company (“Torrington”), commenced this consolidated action to challenge certain aspects of the Department of *1094Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA”) final results in the first administrative review of imports of antifriction bearings from Japan. Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, 56 Fed. Reg. 31,754 (1991). Substantive issues raised by the parties in the underlying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.