Legal Opinion
Rautaruukki Oy v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 31, 1995No. Consolidated Court No. 93-09-00560-ADPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
Aquilino, Judge:
This action consolidates CIT No. 93-09-00560 commenced by Rautaruukki Oy and CIT No. 93-08-00608 brought by Inland Steel Industries, Inc., Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Geneva Steel, Gulf States Steel, Inc. of Alabama, Lukens Steel Company, Sharon Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of USX Corporation. These firms have all interposed motions for judgment on the record compiled by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) sub nom. Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. And Daewoo Electronics Corp. Of America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Goldstar Co., Ltd. And Goldstar Electronics International, Inc. v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America, Independent Radionic Workers of America and Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.