Legal Opinion

B-E Construction, Inc. v. Hustad Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1987No. C5-87-1376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent Hustad Development Corporation contracted to sell a tract of land suitable for residences to L. Robert Erickson, president of appellant B-E Construe tion, Inc. The contract for deed required Hustad to improve the lots with streets, sewers and utilities, among other things. B-E Construction began building and marketing residences on the lots shortly after Hustad began the improvements. Typically, when B-E had completed a residence and had a buyer for it, B-E would collect the sales price from the buyer and pay Hustad for a lot release. Hustad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubachek v. Estate of BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Bernard v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API