Legal Opinion

Lowry v. State Farm Ins. Companies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1990No. 01897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This appeal arises from an Order of the trial court which granted a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the Defendant-Appellee, State Farm Insurance Companies (hereinafter “State Farm”). Further, the trial court’s Order denied a motion for a new trial which was submitted by Plaintiff-Appellant Richard E. Lowry. After careful review, we have concluded that the trial court’s grant of judgment n.o.v. must be reversed, and the verdict of the jury reinstated.

The procedural background of this case shows that the Plaintiff instituted this action seeking two types…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penn-Air, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Northwest Savings Ass'n v. DistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hilliard Lumber Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. RosenzweigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Seither v. Pa. Mfg. Assn. Cas. Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Friter v. Iolab Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Woodin v. JC Penney Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Kearns v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Hackney v. WoodringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API