Commonwealth v. Martin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether under the statute consolidating the various theft offenses, 18 Pa.Cons.Stat. Ann. § 3902 (Purdon 1983), the Commonwealth is required to give notice to the defendant as to the specific provision of the theft statute under which it intends to seek a guilty verdict where the specific theft offense charged is different from the one the Commonwealth is attempting to establish at trial.
In this case appellant was found guilty by a jury of theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake, 1 of driving under the influence, 2 and escape. 3 We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993