Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1990No. 3277PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether under the statute consolidating the various theft offenses, 18 Pa.Cons.Stat. Ann. § 3902 (Purdon 1983), the Commonwealth is required to give notice to the defendant as to the specific provision of the theft statute under which it intends to seek a guilty verdict where the specific theft offense charged is different from the one the Commonwealth is attempting to establish at trial.

In this case appellant was found guilty by a jury of theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake, 1 of driving under the influence, 2 and escape. 3 We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API