Legal Opinion

Friter v. Iolab Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1992No. 3106PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT,

Judge:

This is an appeal from the October 18, 1990 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting defendant Wills Eye Hospital’s motion for judgment non obstante verdicto. We reverse.

On November 22, 1982, Dr. Kenneth Michaile implanted an Iolab Model 91Z anterior chamber intraocular lens into Frederick Friter’s left eye following cataract surgery at Wills Eye Hospital. This particular intraocular lens rests behind the cornea and serves as a substitute lens after the opacified natural lens has been removed from the eye. At the time of Mr. Friter’s surgery, this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Cooper v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Foflygen v. R. ZEMEL, MD (PC)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Kelly v. Methodist HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Stalsitz v. Allentown HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Bryant v. HCA Health Services of No. Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API