Legal Opinion

Hackney v. Woodring

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1993No. 778Published

1Opinion of the Court

424 Pa. Superior Ct. 96 (1993)

622 A.2d 286

Renee Y. HACKNEY, Appellant,

v.

John O. WOODRING, Jr. & Lipco, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 16, 1992.

Filed January 25, 1993.

Reargument Denied April 2, 1993.

Robert Glessner, York, for appellant.

Larry C. Heim, York, for appellee.

Before TAMILIA, JOHNSON and HESTER, JJ.

JOHNSON, Judge:

This is an appeal from the grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient, as a matter of law, to create an issue of fact for the jury on a claim of intentional infliction of emotional…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API