CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Presented to this Court is the question of whether an employee’s time away from work to pursue medical treatment needed to resolve a workers’ compensation injury, where such treatment is readily available during non-work hours, constitutes a “disability” as that term is defined by the Workers’ Compensation Act1 and related case law. We conclude that it does not.
Petitioners, CPV Manufacturing, Inc., employer, and its insurer, PMA Insurance Group, have filed a petition for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a Workers’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Sherrod v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Budd Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Joy Global, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Weissman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- A. Griffis v. Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- A. Robinson v. WCAB (Abramson Center for Jewish Life)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.