Legal Opinion

Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1987No. 53 W.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This is an appeal by allowance from an order of the Commonwealth Court which affirmed the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which had affirmed a workmen’s compensation referee’s order denying appellant’s petition to reinstate compensation benefits. For the reasons to follow, we will reverse the Commonwealth Court and order the Board to reinstate benefits. With one notable exception, the facts are not in dispute. The record before us discloses the following.

Janet Farquhar, appellant, had been an employee of the Corning…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Pryor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Cromie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API