Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
This is an appeal by allowance from an order of the Commonwealth Court which affirmed the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which had affirmed a workmen’s compensation referee’s order denying appellant’s petition to reinstate compensation benefits. For the reasons to follow, we will reverse the Commonwealth Court and order the Board to reinstate benefits. With one notable exception, the facts are not in dispute. The record before us discloses the following.
Janet Farquhar, appellant, had been an employee of the Corning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Pryor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Cromie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.