Legal Opinion

Milliron v. United Benefit Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 14, 1977No. 1854-3PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

One question is presented:

Does a clause in a group medical policy issued by the defendant, United Benefit Life Insurance Company, excluding coverage where an insured "has received or is entitled to receive" workmen's compensation operate to bar plaintiff's claim for medical expenses?

The trial court said "yes" and dismissed the action. We affirm.

This question must be considered in light of the following stipulated facts:

I

The plaintiff was severely injured in a truck collision in the early morning hours of July 1, 1971. At the time of the collision which occurred on Highway SR 90 in Adams…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Keffer v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Aetna Insurance v. KentWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Antram v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. United Pacific Insurance v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Miller v. INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Starrett v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API