Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance v. Kent
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1975No. 43715PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Aetna Insurance Company seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming a judgment of the trial court construing a loading and unloading clause in a contractor’s insurance policy, the clause being contained in the section of the policy dealing with exclusions from liability. We reverse.
The stipulated facts show the following: Intervenor Tracy Smith was riding as a passenger in the front seat of a Volvo sports coupe owned and operated by Mark P. Poll. They were proceeding behind a dump truck owned by respondent Jack Kent, doing business as Jack Kent Dump Truck Service, when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Butte Brewing Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Bobier v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Handley v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE v. GannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.