Legal Opinion

Jewel Tea Co. v. State Tax Commissioner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1940No. File No. 6666PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

This controversy involves construction of chapter 249, Session Laws of 1937, known as the “Sales Tax Act.”

Section 2 of the Act imposes a tax of two per cent upon the gross receipts from all sales of tangible personal property, except as exempted, sold at retail in this state to consumers or users. Section 6 requires the retailer to add the tax, or its average equivalent, to the sales price or charge, and when added, such tax constitutes a part of the price or charge. Section 10, subd. (2) provides that “every retailer, at the time of making the return required hereunder, shall compute and pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Dushek v. WatlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Blocker Drilling Canada, Ltd. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United Fuel Gas Company v. BattleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Voss v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API