Legal Opinion

Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1918No. 9229PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari; from Biehmond superior court—Judge H. C. Hammond. September 15, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. Under the act of August 17, 1906 (Acts 1906, p. 107; Civil Code of 1910, § 2471), the application on which an insurance policy is based is not to be considered as part of the policy or contract between the parties, unless a copy thereof is attached to or accompanies the policy. Therefore, statements- made in the application are not to be treated as warranties or • covenants, on account of the failure or falsity of which the policy may be avoided, unless a copy of the application is attached to the policy ór accompanies it, though representations contained in the application, if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Southern Life Insurance v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Wilkins v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Couch v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. GriffethCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API