Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bugg
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
The terms of the life-insurance policy in the instant case appear to coincide with the stipulations of the policy set forth in the certified questions propounded to the Supreme Court in the case of Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hale, 177 Ga. 632 (170 S. E. 875), except that in the instant ease it appears that there was a written application for insurance, which, however, was not attached to the policy, whereas in the Hale case the record in no wise indicated the existence of a written application. In that ease there was no effort to prove fraud on the part of the insured, but the defense…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Brown v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Piedmont Southern Life Insurance v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- State Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Lee v. All States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Auld v. SchmelzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.